Event
- Event ID
- 894
- Quality
- Description
An explosion took place at the hydrodesulphurisation unit of a refinery's crude oil.
It was caused by a leak at the suction line of a hydrogen compressor used for the re-circulation of the hydrogen required for the desulphurisation process. The compressor was in a room without ventilation, the hydrogen cumulated there creating an explosive mixture which ignited.The unit's alarm was immediately triggered in the control room and the operator activated the internal emergency plan. The site's firefighting team went to the site and brought the following fire under control. The external fire fighters service did not need to intervene.
The accident caused two fatalities and five injuries among the workers. According to one of the sources, the plant supervisor sent personnel to investigate. it is not clear if this was the cause of the fatalities and injuries. The explosion was heard at 12 km distance.
The operation of the unit affected by the accident were stopped as well as the neighbouring thermal cracking unit, while the operation of 30 units of the refinery have continued their operation.- Event Initiating system
- Classification of the physical effects
- Hydrogen Release and Ignition
- Nature of the consequences
- Macro-region
- North America
- Country
- Mexico
- Date
- Component involved
- joint/connection (gasket)
- Failure mode
- rupture & ignition
- Initiating cause
- material degradation (ageing)
- Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING CAUSE was a hydrogen leak on a compressor for the re-circulation of the hydrogen.
The leaking element was a gasket on the suction line of the compressor, which had been installed at the commissioning of the facility, 9 years before, and had never been inspected or replaced.
The consequences of the leak and ignition were serious, because the explosion occurred in a confined space.To the ROOT CAUSE contributed factor such as:
(1) failing to inspect and maintain critical components,
(2) ill design of the compressor room,
(3) lack of safety awareness among personnel and the management.
The origin of all this was probably a lack of proper risk assessment and proper safety management.- Root causes
- Date entry in HIAD
- 01/01/2018
Facility
- Application
- Petrochemical industry
- Sub-application
- Hydrodesulphurisation process
- Hydrogen supply chain stage
- All components affected
seal, compressor
- Process temperature range [C]
- ambient temperature (-50°C to +50°C)
- Process pressure range [MPa]
- medium pressure (2 to 10 MPa)
- Location type
- Confined
- Location
- industrial area
- Operational condition
Emergency & Consequences
- Number of fatalities
- 2
- Number of injured persons
- 5
- Post-event summary
Thedamage to the facility was cosniderable, but the costs are unknown.
The thermal cracking unit restarted eight days after the accident. The supply of fuel in the region of north Mexico was not affected, but the daily production of sulphur and gasoline was reduced until the restart of the hydrodesulphurization unit sever weeks later.- Official legal action
An internal investigation committee was set up to find the root cause of the accident. The administration in charge of environmental protection opened an investigation to define the preventive measures that the operator must put in place to avoid this type of accident.
The results of these investigations were not shared in the public space.
- Emergency action
The site's firefighting team went to the site, brought the fire under control and rescued the affected workers. The external fire fighters service did not need to intervene.
Lesson Learnt
- Lesson Learnt
In absence of publicly available conclusion of the investigation, the following recommendations can be drawn on the facts known:
(1) A risk assessment is necessary for all area where hydrogen is produced and handled, with specific focus on confined and semi-confined spaces where hydrogen can accumulate and explode
(2) Improve the diagnostic systems, so that alarm signals (for example on gas detection and fires) can be easily distinguished from signals carrying operative information. This will help in timely understanding what is going on in the control room.
(3) Training of personnel must be organised around safety topics, such as gas safety, emergency procedures, and the level of personnel awareness on safety aspects has to be measured and maintained (no one-off training but a full lifetime programme).
In-depth data
- Release type
- gas
- Involved substances (% vol)
- H2 100%
- Release temperature [°C]
- 25
- Probable IGNITION SOURCE
- Explosion type
References
- Sources categories
- ARIA
- Reference & weblink
ARIA event no. 39705
https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/accident/39705/
(accessed August 2020)Reuter news of the event
https://www.reuters.com/article/mexico-refinery-explosion-idUSN07230164…
(accessed August 2020)Also in H2TOOLS
https://h2tools.org/lessons/hydrogen-explosion-due-failure-incorrectly-…
(accessed Sept 2025)News.Comau.au
https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/breaking-news/second-worker-di…
(accessed May 2026)