Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Fire on a valve of a hydrogen pipe network

Event

Event ID
1095
Quality
Description

At a chemical processing plant, a release of pressurised hydrogen gas resulted in an explosion and fire injuring lightly three workers and causing damage to plant.
The incident occurred during the recommissioning of equipment after routine scheduled maintenance.
The release was caused by the failure of a butterfly valve under a hydrogen of approximately 2000 kPa (20 bar), due probably to wrongly installed bearing during the maintenance.
The event had the potential to cause a more significant adverse effect.

Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Macro-region
Oceania
Country
Australia
Date
Component involved
valve (generic)
Failure mode
rupture & ignition
Initiating cause
wrong installation
Root CAUSE analysis

The INITIATING CAUSE was the release of hydrogen caused by the failure of a valve.
The bearing bush bolts of the butterfly valve may not have been correctly installed at the time of overhaul resulting in separation of valve bearing bush.

The local authorities identified the following key issues:
(1) High pressure valves must be quality checked for correct assembly post maintenance overhauls.
(2) Effective systems and processes that ensure quality assurance must be used for the overhaul and testing of the valves to prevent failure of such valves.
(3) The maintenance of the equipment involved in hydrogen usage must comply with Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) specifications.

The ROOT CAUSE may then be identified in shortcomings in the execution of the maintenance. Nevertheless, a component may lay in material defects.

Root causes
Date entry in HIAD
01/07/2024

Facility

Application
Chemical industry
Sub-application
unspecified chemical process
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected

bearing ,valve

Location type
Unknown
Location
unknown
Operational condition
Pre-event occurrences

Event happed at the re-start of operations after scheduled maintenance

Emergency & Consequences

Number of fatalities
0
Number of injured persons
3
Post-event summary

Three injured workers: two were recommissioning the equipment, and a third was a store worker approximately at 40 m from the location of the release. The injured workers did not require hospitalisation.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

The local authorities issued the following recommendations. All Site Senior Executives should:
(1) Remember that hydrogen is considerably more hazardous than liquid petroleum gas (LPG), as it possesses a wider explosives range, and the ignition energy is approximately 13 times lower than that of the LPG. Further, the low viscosity and small size of a hydrogen molecule create the potential for gradual dispersion through the atomic matrix of solid metal, such as pipework, leading to additional challenges in containing hydrogen.
(2) Employ highly sensitive and specialised detection method, as detecting hydrogen gas leaks can present difficulties, particularly due to its tendency to disperse rapidly.
(3) Refer to OEM specifications to ensure work methods and testing procedures are suitable for application, when working on a hydrogen equipment.
(4) Ensure suitable trained personnel are engaged in maintenance and quality assurance.

[Note of HIAD Validator: it is unclear if these recommendations were triggered by safety-shortcoming findings specific to this event, or if they are general recommendations issued in all cases]

In-depth data

Release type
gas
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 100%
Probable IGNITION SOURCE
Explosion type

References

Sources categories
Investigation report
Reference & weblink

Government of Western Australia, report 01/2016
https://www.worksafe.wa.gov.au/publications/dangerous-goods-safety-sign…
(accessed September 2025)

Also mentioned in Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_safety
(accesed Septemebr 2025)