Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Explosion of a storage vessel in a hydrogen production facility

Event

Event ID
1053
Quality
Description

This incident occurred at the hydrogen production and storage unit of (probably) a power plant using hydrogen as a coolant of the turbine-generator system. Hydrogen was produced probably by water electrolysis (the source does not say it) and stored in 6 steel tanks.
One of the six hydrogen storage tanks exploded killing a staff member. The investigation determined that a mixing of hydrogen and oxygen occurred in the tank. The needle valve of the hydrogen and oxygen pressure regulator jammed, and the oxygen leaked into the hydrogen main supply line and entered the hydrogen tank.
The explosion was evaluated to be equivalent to a TNT explosion in the range of 64-125 kg of TNT. The tank which exploded was pulled off from its position ripped open and completely destroyed, two other vessels fell due to the pressure wave caused by the explosion, and the other 3 were damaged in different degrees.

Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Macro-region
Asia
Country
China
Date
Component involved
pressure regulator
Failure mode
rupture & ignition
Initiating cause
inadequate or wrong design
Root CAUSE analysis

The INITIATING CAUSE was a defective valve which jammed and allowed oxygen to access the hydrogen gas stream.
The cause of the ignition was very possibly a spark generated by the friction of the high-speed gas flow, which can reach 100m/s when opening the valve of the vessel, driven by a pressure difference of about 392kPa.
Since the needle valve had already jammed twice before, one component of the ROOT CAUSE could be related to lack of timely repair process. Also, the required diagnostic system was not in place. Apparently, there was only a hydrogen purity measurement at the generator, and not on the line to the tanks. This system, foreseen by the "Chemical Operation Management System", would avoid escalation.

Root causes
Date entry in HIAD
01/07/2024

Facility

Application
Power plant
Sub-application
unspecified power plant
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected

hydrogen tank, hydrogen supply line, pressure regulator

Location type
Open
Location
industrial area
Operational condition
Pre-event occurrences

Operation practice proved that the needle valve with the function and structure adopted in this installation is very prone to jamming. The investigation revealed that it had already jammed twice before, on August 26, and again on August 31.

The investigation mentions also that a 'repair' had occurred before the incident, but it does not further explain.

Description of the facility/unit/process/substances

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPONENT
The stainless steel vessels had a volume of 10m3, (inner diameter: 1500mm, height 6400mm, wall thickness 12mm), Design pressure= 981kPa (9.8 bar), working pressure is 588kPa (5.9 bar). At the moment of the incident, the tanks were not completely filled: the exploded tank No. 1 tank was at 490kPa (4.9 bar).

Emergency & Consequences

Number of fatalities
1
Number of injured persons
0
Emergency action

The fire brigade rushed to the scene in time to extinguish the burning hydrogen storage tank and took isolation measures to prevent the accident from spreading and expanding.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

The investigation formulated the following recommendations:
1. When rebuilding the hydrogen production unit, a new type of pressure regulator shall be used, with a liquid level limit interlock protection device.
2. A hydrogen purity meter or an oxygen meter shall be installed on the hydrogen side to continuously monitor the hydrogen purity.
3. The management of equipment (monitoring, defect repair, replacement) shall be improved/strengthen. An immediately stop the operations shall be triggered to eliminate defects affecting hydrogen purity.
4. The equipment belonging to the hydrogen production unit shall be maintained once a year and overhauled every three years.
5. According to the requirements of "Fire Inspection Manual" and "Code for Design of Power Installations in Explosion and Fire Hazardous Environments", anti-static measures shall be in place.
6. Technical training and awareness shall be strengthen.

In-depth data

Release type
gas mixture
Involved substances (% vol)
H2,
O2
Probable IGNITION SOURCE
Explosion type

References

Sources categories
Scientific article
Reference & weblink

Zhao Yun, Cause Analysis of Hydrogen Storage Tank Explosion Accident, East China Electric Power, No. 11 (1990)
1994-2022 China Academic Journal, ElectronicPublishing House. All right reserved. www.cnki.net

B.Wang et al., Hydrogen related accidents and lesson learned from events reported in the
in east continental Asia,#2023, ICHS-2023

Google translation of the paper of Zhao Yun, Cause Analysis of Hydrogen Storage Tank Explosion Accident, East China Electric Power, No. 11 (1990)