Skip to main content
Clean Hydrogen Partnership

Explosion of flammable gases at a refinery

Event

Event ID
526
Quality
Description

An explosion occurred at chemical industry producing olephins and phenols. 
A non-return valve failed due to hydrogen embrittlement. The valve was on the light hydrocarbon gas line in the gas compression system of an olefins unit. It released a hydrogen-rich hydrocarbon mixtures (approximately 19% vol of hydrogen) at pressure in the 20 to 30 bar range, forming a vapour cloud that ignited and started a large flammable gas leak that eventually ignited, resulting in an unconfined vapor cloud explosion (VCE).
The investigators calculated that approximately 15,000 pounds of process gas was released prior to the explosion, and that approximately 3,000 pounds of gas was involved in the explosion. The accident resulted in injuries to several workers and extensive damage to the plant.

Event Initiating system
Classification of the physical effects
Hydrogen Release and Ignition
Nature of the consequences
Macro-region
North America
Country
United States
Date
Component involved
valve (non-return)
Failure mode
rupture
Initiating cause
H2-driven material degradation
Root CAUSE analysis

the INITIATING cause of the accident was the internal structural failure and drive shaft blow-out of a 36-inch diameter pneumatically-assisted non- return valve. Fractography revealed typical hydrogen - embrittlement damage. Explosion energy calculation assessed the hydrogen content in the vapour cloud around 20%. The EPA/OHSA Shell report of 1998 identified these causes components: 

  1. Inadequate Valve Design 
  2. Failure to Learn from Prior Incidents 
  3. Inadequate Process Hazards Analysis 
  4. Inadequate Mechanical Integrity Measures 
  5. Inadequate Operating Procedures 

Plus the following Contributing Factors 

  • No Indication of Hydrocarbon Leak / Delayed Operator Response to Leak 
  • Inadequate Communications Practices
Root causes
Date entry in HIAD
01/01/2020

Facility

Application
Chemical industry
Sub-application
Plastics production process
Hydrogen supply chain stage
All components affected

process gases line

Process temperature range [C]
ambient temperature (-50°C to +50°C)
Process pressure range [MPa]
medium pressure (2 to 10 MPa)
Location type
Semiconfined
Location
populated area
Operational condition
Description of the facility/unit/process/substances

According to the CSB report, "The first phase or “hot side” of the process involves the thermal cracking of large-molecule hydrocarbon feeds into smaller molecules by mixing the crude petroleum feeds with steam in a series of high-temperature (850 C) pyrolysis furnaces. The cracked hydrocarbon molecules are then separated by boiling point (fractionated) in a large vessel at elevated temperature, where heavy oils and pitch are processed and removed. The second phase or “cold side” of OP-III involves compression and treatment of lighter hydrocarbon gases and separation of light hydrocarbon molecules by low temperature fractionation of condensed light hydrocarbons."

Emergency & Consequences

Number of fatalities
0
Number of injured persons
10
Currency
$
Property loss (onsite)
101.000.000
Post-event summary

As a result of the explosion and fire, extensive damage occurred to the facility, and several workers received minor injuries. Damage to the facility was estimated at US$101M. Nearby residential property was damaged. Major transportation routes adjacent to the facility were closed for several hours, and nearby residents were advised to remain indoors.

Lesson Learnt

Lesson Learnt

Check and butterfly valves are used in refineries, petrochemical plants, chemical plants, and power generation facilities to stop and control the flow (e.g., prevent reversal of the flow's direction) of process materials through pipelines or apertures. They play therefore a critical role in the management of the process and its safety.  

The valve failure which caused the accidents had various design aspects which made it unsuitable for the operation of the installation. The EPA and OSH report contains the following recommendations (for a full list see reference): 

  1. To review process systems to determine if installed valves may be subject to a shaft blow-out hazard, and modify or replace those valves as necessary 
  2. To consult valve manufacturers or other appropriate design authorities to ensure that any modifications made are safe. 
  3. To update and revalidate the process hazards analysis. 
  4. To implement a more rigorous mechanical integrity inspection program for valves in extreme service. 
  5. To develop and implement a corporate information communication system. 
  6. To implement precautionary measures contained in OSHA’s PSM standard and EPA’s RMP rule to prevent flammable gas leaks from resulting in vapour cloud explosions. 

Specific to hydrogen, the EPA stated that "valves used in hydrogen-rich or hydrogen sulphide-containing environments may be more susceptible to blow-out due to hydrogen embrittlement of critical internal components, particularly if these are made from hardened steel." (EPA enforcement Alert, 2, August 1999)

In-depth data

Release type
gas mixture
Involved substances (% vol)
H2 19%,light hydrocarbons
Release pressure [MPa]
2
Probable IGNITION SOURCE
Explosion type

References

Sources categories
OHSA
Reference & weblink

EPA & OHSA full accident investigation report https://ncsp.tamu.edu/reports/EPA/shellrpt.pdf (accesed Feb 2026)

Leslie Oif, "Facilities Urged to Review Systems for Risk of Check or Butterfly Valves Safety Hazards" Volume 2, Number 6 of "Enforcement Alert" (EPA 300-N-99-011, August 1999 ), US EPA Office of Regulatory Enforce