Event
- Event ID
- 902
- Quality
- Description
A hot oil line (8-inch) in the hydrodesulphurisation unit failed due to fatigue cracking. Hot oil at 50 bar and 343°C sprayed across the roadway into the hydrogen units where ignition occurred. The pipe break was a guillotine -type, probably in the heat affected zone at 2 inches from a welding.
The intense fire around the pipe rack in the hydrogen plant caused a hydrogen line (16-inch) to rupture, adding a second blow torch to the fire. In successive order, more pipes ruptured with explosions.
After six-and-a-half hours, the fire was extinguished.
Damage was extensive. The three hydrogen units and the four HDS units were heavily damaged or destroyed.- Event Initiating system
- Classification of the physical effects
- Hydrogen Release and Ignition
- Nature of the consequences
- fire followed by an explosion
- Macro-region
- South America
- Country
- Venezuela
- Date
- Component involved
- pipe (generic)
- Failure mode
- rupture & ignition
- Initiating cause
- conventional component failure (fire)
- Root CAUSE analysis
The INITIATING CAUSE is fatigue cracking of the oil pipeline, which caused the failure of a hydrogen pipe.
Sources refer to probable fatigue cracking, possibly hydrogen assisted.
Before the loss, the line which failed was judged as having excessive vibration.Failure of managing out-of-specification fatigue phenomena may be the root cause, or at least a contributing cause.
- Root causes
- Date entry in HIAD
- 01/01/2018
Facility
- Application
- Petrochemical industry
- Sub-application
- Hydrodesulphurisation process
- Hydrogen supply chain stage
- All components affected
hydrogen (generation) unit
- Process temperature range [C]
- High temperature (100°C to 500°C)
- Process pressure range [MPa]
- medium pressure (2 to 10 MPa)
- Location type
- Open
- Location
- industrial area
- Operational condition
- Pre-event occurrences
9 years earlier vibrations had been noted on the gas line which failed. The structure had been stiffened by means of gussets. An hypothesis is that this intervention had amplified/accelerated the fatigue phenomena which was caused the break of the line., together with blistering due to hydrogen attack.
Emergency & Consequences
- Number of fatalities
- 0
- Number of injured persons
- 0
- Currency
- US$
- Property loss (onsite)
- 75.000.000.000
- Post-event summary
Damage was extensive. The three hydrogen plants and the four HDS units were heavily damaged
or destroyed.
Other source report M$89(Excluding Production loss.)- Emergency action
The fire lasted 6h30
In-depth data
- Release type
- gas mixture
- Involved substances (% vol)
- oil
H2 - Release temperature [°C]
- 343
- Probable IGNITION SOURCE
- Flame type
References
- Sources categories
- ARIA
- Reference & weblink
Description of the event in the database ARIA
https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/accident/7315/
(accessed September 2020)MARSH report, 100 largest losses in the hydrocarbon industry, 27th edition 2022
https://www.marsh.com/cz/en/industries/energy-and-power/insights/100-la…
(accessed January 2024)A. Goel, Refinery Reliability Through Advanced NDT Methodologies,
Proc. National Seminar on Non-Destructive Evaluation Dec. 7 - 9, 2006, Hyderabad
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.216.4819&rep=r…
(accessed September 2020)