Event
- Event ID
- 679
- Quality
- Description
The event occurred at a hydrogen processing unit of the refinery. A mixture of hydrocarbon and hydrogen leaked ad the 90-debrees-elbow of a carbon steel pipe. The mixture formed a cloud which exploded.
The investigation concluded that the failure of the line was the result of the thinning of the carbon steel elbow due to long-term erosion/corrosion.
The explosion was followed by fires which caused extensive damage to the hydrocracker, hydrodesulphurisation, and hydrogen processing units.
The explosion is classified by one of the source (Oral et al.) as a Vapour Cloud Explosion (VPE).- Event Initiating system
- Classification of the physical effects
- Hydrogen Release and Ignition
- Nature of the consequences
- Macro-region
- North America
- Country
- United States
- Date
- Component involved
- pipe (generic)
- Failure mode
- leak & ignition
- Initiating cause
- material degradation (internal corrosion / erosion)
- Root CAUSE analysis
INITIATING cause was the failure of a pipe due corrosion.
Inspection was possibly not able to detect the damage, but it is not known if this was due to limitation of the non-destructive equipment , to the absence of the correct inspection schedule or incorrect assessment of the risk and consequences. ICHEME/MHIDS reported a wrong dimension of the failed part, which suggest A ROOT CAUSE related to installation errors, wit ha contribution from an inadequate inspection.- Root causes
- Date entry in HIAD
- 01/01/2020
Facility
- Application
- Petrochemical industry
- Sub-application
- Hydrogenation process
- Hydrogen supply chain stage
- All components affected
Pipe and valve
- Location type
- Confined
- Location
- industrial area
- Operational condition
Emergency & Consequences
- Number of fatalities
- 16
- Number of injured persons
- 0
- Currency
- US$
- Property loss (onsite)
- 78.800.000
- Property loss (offsite)
- 550.000
- Post-event summary
The fire was visible from 32 km away. People in a 5 sq. km area were evacuate. Material damage is significant ($ 78.3 million).
Los Angeles Times reproted 14 light injuries, Rigas&Amyotte 16.- Official legal action
The company had to pay a $550,000 penalty to the South Coast Air Quality Management District in a settlement stemming from the 1992 explosion and other violations.
[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-08-10-me-25508-story.html, accessed November 2025]- Emergency action
People in a 5 sq. km area were evacuated.
The fire-fighting effort was coordinated by the refinery emergency response team, with the city and County fire departments using the joint incident command system. The refinery emergency response team placed booms to stop oily water run-off generated by the firefighting effort from reaching the city harbour.
The fire was finally extinguished after three days.
In-depth data
- Release type
- gas mixture
- Involved substances (% vol)
- H2 hydrocarbon
- Probable IGNITION SOURCE
- Explosion type
References
- Sources categories
- Collections
- Reference & weblink
MARSH report, 100 largest losses in the hydrocarbon industry, 27th edition 2022
https://www.marsh.com/cz/en/industries/energy-and-power/insights/100-la…
(accessed January 2024)ARIA database
event 11282
https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/accident/11282/
(accesed November 2025)Event 5815 of the UK database ICHEME/MHIDAS
The database is no longer available , but data can be download as PDF .
https://www.icheme.org/knowledge/safety-centre/resources/accident-data/
(accessed October 2020)Los Angeles news
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-10-09-mn-724-story.html
(accwssed November 2025)Rigas F., Amyotte P., Hydrogen safety, Green chemistry and chemical engineering, CRC Press, Taylor & Frances Group; 2012. ISBN-13: 978-1439862315
(with the wrong date)